All companies want to excel in the hardware and chips market. Apple with the introduction of special M series processors M1 Max Has showed how important the market for laptops, or rather MacBooks, was to them. Apple was so confident in their performance that left out Intel processors. But Intel is not the company to easily outperform the competition, so for its twelfth-generation Alder Lake processors, it opted for a hybrid architecture similar to Apple’s M-Series chips. Now that processors Alder Lake H Introduced for laptops and the products equipped with them are gradually entering the market, it is a good time to compare the flagship of this family, Core i9-12900HK with the Apple M1 Max.
Although in the real world many people are reluctant to buy a laptop when they buy it, there is always talk of better performance of these products, especially if we are dealing with new and even proprietary processors. Apple with M series processors showed that it can be used with ARM architecture It also provided high performance to users. But Intel wants to warn the Cupertinos that even with X86 architecture Such a performance or even higher can be experienced.
Intel’s most powerful current processor for the laptop market, the Core i9-12900HK outperforms its predecessor as well as AMD’s 5000 advisor, yet against the Apple M1 Max chip used in 16-inch MacBook Pro How does it work? To answer this question, we go to the benchmark results of these chips.
In this article, a 16-inch MacBook Pro with a gaming laptop MSI GE76 Raider It uses a Core i9 processor and is equipped with a 17.3-inch 1080p display with a refresh rate of 360 Hz and graphics for the RTX 3080 Ti laptop. In contrast, the MacBook Pro has a 16.2-inch display with a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
Compare Apple M1 Max with Intel Core i9-12900HK
In the following, we will compare the performance of these processors in several benchmarks. If you want to know Alder Lake processors against Advisor 6000 What they do, we suggest you read this Digito article.
The first benchmark compared in this article is the Cinebench R23 nT. This benchmark is used for 3D rendering using the same rendering engine as Cinema4D. This benchmark takes 10 minutes, and a processor with more cores will win.
Given this, it is natural for the Intel Core i9-12900HK to be higher than the Apple chip as they have 14 and 10 cores, respectively. In this test, not only did the M1 Max fail the Intel flagship processor, but it also fell short of the 11th generation of Core processors.
Since chip comparison 14 core Not fair with 10 and 8 cores, we go for the Cinebench R23 for single core operation. This test also takes 10 minutes and puts a short strain on the processor, however it determines the performance of the best CPU cores. It is worth noting that in general, the operation of multiple cores is not so unfair, because each company uses its own architecture and users go to it.
If you think that in the single-core segment, Apple wants to beat Intel, you are wrong. In this benchmark, the Intel Core i9-12900HK processor was able to 24 percent Perform better than Apple’s representative. The M1 Max even outperformed the previous generation of Intel flagship processors by almost 6%. Of course, Apple chip in this benchmark was able to with a small difference of 2.4 percent, Advisor 9 5900HX Defeat AMD.
Next we go to the popular benchmark of Primate Lab, namely Geekbench 5. This benchmark includes 21 short loops including things like image compression and HTML5. Compiler and optimization are very important in this benchmark. Xcode 11.2 was used to compile version 5.1 and Clang 9.0 was used for Windows. While Xcode is natively supported by the Apple M1, Clang 9.0 is not optimized for Alder Lake as it is two years old. However, we do not know what effect these will have on CPU performance.
First we go to test the multi-core of our four laptops. Benchmark results for MacBook Pro M1 Max are obtained from user reviews and we select one of the highest scores. In the multi-core segment, it’s the Intel processor that has the upper hand.
Intel Core i9-12900HK in this benchmark showed 4.5% higher performance than M1 Max, which is less than other benchmarks. Nevertheless, Apple’s chip outperformed the Intel Core i9-11900HK 11th generation processor by 44%. 48% To be placed above the 9 5900HX advisor. In any case, the winner of this part of the competition is the representative of Intel.
After the multi-core benchmark, we move on to the single-core geo-benchmark benchmark. As you know, both benchmarks are very important, and although Intel can beat the Apple chip in the multi-core segment, this difference is very small, but what about the single-core segment?
In terms of single-core, the Intel Core i9-12900HK ranks first, although it differs from the M1 Max by only 2.8%. Therefore, their performance can be considered almost the same. In this respect, Intel’s 11th generation processor lags behind both its new generation and Apple’s chip. In fourth place is the Raizen 9 5900HX processor, which is almost a big difference with the Intel representative. According to these results, the Core i9-12900HK wins this part of the competition.
So far we have focused only on the CPU, while Apple and Nvidia also have a lot to say about the GPU. In this regard, we go to a benchmark to check the GPU performance of these laptops. This benchmark examines GPU performance in areas such as depth of field and face recognition. In this experiment, an API called Rick Bar was used in OpenCL.
As you know, the Windows laptops in this article use an integrated Intel and AMD graphics processor in addition to a standalone graphics card. With this in mind, the performance of both of them can be seen in the benchmarks. So the purple bar is for integrated graphics and the green bar is for standalone graphics. Since the MacBook Pro with the M1 Max has only one graphic, the purple and green bars show the same amount.
While the product is equipped with a twelfth generation Intel processor from RTX 3080 Ti graphics The other two laptops are equipped with GeForce RTX 3080 graphics. However, the frequency of this graphics is higher in the device equipped with the 11th generation Intel processor, but its RAM is faster in the Raizen model.
First, let’s take a look at Intel and AMD integrated graphics performance. As you can see in the diagram, the M1 Max performs much better. Apple GPU has a unique design and also uses LPDDR5 / 6400, which puts it above the integrated graphics of Intel and AMD in terms of memory bandwidth. But what about independent graphics?
Computers do light work with integrated graphics, and when you start doing heavy work such as playing games, the device switches to standalone graphics. Apple has said that the M1 Max chip is slightly slower and slightly faster than Nvidia’s GeForce graphics, which of course depends on the GPU being compared. But the Cupertinos do not appear to have approached Geekbench for this claim.
In this benchmark, RTX 3080 Ti up 136 percent It performs better than the M1 Max. According to the results, OpenCL does not seem to have much to do with the higher frequency of cores, nor does the high number of RTX 3080 cores have much effect on the benchmark results. How such a performance manifests itself in the gaming world is not yet known, but we can safely say that Nvidia’s powerful RTX graphics can easily beat Apple GPU.
PugetBench examines the primer through a set of tasks and scores them in various categories. Overall, the 16-inch MacBook Pro is rated 1,328 Achieves a score higher than 1,277 on laptops with Intel Core i9-12900HK processors and GeForce RTX 3080 Ti. The difference between these products is 17.8%, but if we compare the Apple representative with the 11th generation of Intel and AMD, we get 57.7 and 90.5% higher performance, respectively.
Well, so far the M1 Max has suffered a heavy defeat from Intel and Nvidia, but let’s take a look at another benchmark; Where the 16-inch MacBook Pro shines: Adobe Premier. To compare the performance of these laptops, the PugetBench database obtained by users was used. In this regard, we consider the high performance in this database.
When we look at the results separately, we come across different differences. Apple has a high score in the Live Playback Score and Export Score, while it is the loser in the Effects Score and GPU Score. In terms of Effects Score, the Intel Core i9-12900HK is nearly 2.7% higher than the M1 Max. In terms of GPU, the RTX 3080 Ti and the two RTX 3080 models had 40.8, 22 and 27% higher performance, respectively.
Despite such cases, overall the differences have been such that the M1 Max has been able to win the field. The reason for this is the good design of the M1 Max along with the Adobe hardware optimization. Of course, we have to point out that Premier is a large program and its performance in PuhgetBench may be different from the real world. Add to this how to use the primer to make it a little more complicated. However, the Apple M1 Max still performs well in this area.
Comparison of Apple M1 Max with Core i9-12900HK
You might say to yourself that under some circumstances, the performance of these processors can be different and we are not faced with a definite winner. But according to benchmark results, it’s the Intel processor that has the upper hand and performs better. But we must not forget one thing: we are dealing with different operating systems.
If you want the best, you should definitely go for one of the products equipped with the latest Intel or MacBook Pro processor, but the choice between them depends on your needs as well as the operating system you are considering. Add to all that, because the MacBook Pro 16 is minimal $ 2,500 There is a price. In general, buy any of these products, as long as they meet your needs, you will be happy with your choice. But if you’re looking for gaming of the day, despite the limitations of MacOS, Apple Graphics is still a long way from Nvidia’s powerful graphics cards.